“Humbert like most dictators
was interested only in his vision of other people. He had created the Lolita,
he desired, and would not budge from that image”(Nafisi,48).
Persepolis,
tells the story of young lass coming of age in the republic of Iran during the
Islamic Revolution and the rule of the fundamentalist Islamic government that
followed. On the surface, the role of the villain seems to be attributed to the
“narrow-minded” fundamental Islamic government and its harsh treatment of
Iranian citizens. Meanwhile, the west is depicted as a safe haven which that
grants freedom and equality for all which makes it the “hero” of the story. But
in actuality, the complexities of world politics and involvement of various
western countries in the affairs of Iran makes the lines blurry. So who
therefore is the truly villain?
The
main goal of the Islamic government of Iran is to restore the country back to
the days of Muhammad. Ore more accurately, create a country whose foundations
lay in the teaching of Islam and a government to enforce such ideas. Blinded by
these ideologies and mindset of the west being completely evil, the government
became a tyrant. To reach their vision
of Iran, they tumbled upon the fundamental human rights of its citizens without
much as a blink of an eye. By enforcing that women wear veils and that men wear
beard. The consumption of alcohol, western films and music were also strictly
banned. To create a better Iran, it was better if the people had no say in
their own lives and what they can expose themselves to. Rather, they were to be
completely obedient to the law or suffer consequences such as lashing or even
death.
Though the west provides more freedom and
equality in their own sector of the world, it involvement in the affairs of
Iran brought more harm than good to its citizens at times. The purpose of the
Islamic revolution was to get rid of a useless king, whose father rise to power
had being obstructed by the British government. In order to have easy asses to
oil, an illiterate military officer was made king leading to the devastation to
the country for years. After being dethroned, the Iranian king was refused
asylum by then United States president forcing him to take refuge in Egypt.
Thus, further the rift between Iranian and Egyptians for their betrayal by
allying with the nation of Israel. The worst offense was selling of chemical
weapons to Iraq and Iran by Germany. Thus endangering the lives of many Iranian
war victims who given the structure of the health care system suffered. The
involvement of the west was based on their narrow view of Iran as cheap source
of oil and market of machinery. Their desire to make profit of this resource
and sell their products prevented them from seeing the harsh realities of the
people
The difficult state under which Marji and her
parents along with friends and loved one was a result of the influence of two
villain. One who hides behind the ideas of purity and scarcity of religion and
the other fueled by greed for more oil and profit. At the same time, they both
play a “hero” for the nation of Iran. One by offering a safe haven for its
citizens and providing the promise of personal freedom. The other for doing its
best to repair the damages caused by the other and to make Iran a state independent
of the west’s influence.
I love how you bring attention to the complexity of the matter surrounding Iran and its relation to the West. I think it's far too often that people merely accept things at face value, without paying attention to the wider reality and implications of the facts at hand. Especially when reading novels like "Persepolis" and "Reading Lolita in Tehran", it's important not to fall into the trap of just assuming one side is "right" and that the other is "wrong"; you have to take the entirety of the situation into context and realize that there's no truly blameless party.
ReplyDeleteI couldn't agree more. The most important thing you can do when examining a complex situation such as this one is do your research. There are no set lines between right and wrong, there's no real sense of morality at all when it comes to global politics a lot of the time. Read all sides, don't ever take news at face value and educate yourself. Works such as Persepolis and Reading Lolita in Tehran serve as a useful window in to a world that we in the west may no very little about, but that doesn't mean they should be used as the only source from which to construct an actual view of the situation.
ReplyDeleteI also could not agree more. I think it is very important to also read into the context and backround and to be well informed before you make judgements of something. I feel like many people did not do this in terms of the Kony 2012 campaign. Also I think it is interesting you are writing about this because so many people interested in the history of Iran have stated that it is a serious issue how Iranians are always depicted in the context of villian or victim, something I believe Satrapi lessened atleast a little.
ReplyDelete