Voltaire playfully writes about rape, disembowelment, murder, and women who
have half their buttocks slashed away to feed twenty starving janissaries, to
make serious assertions about the dangers of religion and materialism.
After drifting down a river current in total darkness for the span of a day,
losing their canoe to rapids, and climbing across boulders, Cacambo and Candide
arrive in Eldorado where the pebbles and mud are rubies and gold. To elaborate
on the question Jeff asks in his blog post- Why doesn't Candide remain in this
utopia? In Eldorado, everyone is a priest. There is such a surplus of food and
treasure that it becomes commonplace instead of a catalyst for war and enslavement.
But, this is surreal. I believe it is Candide's natural, human craving for progress
and empowerment that drive him to leave paradise. He has been raised in a
European society that praises material wealth, and he cannot escape this ingrained mindset. In Eldorado, wealth may be yellow mud, but to two men raised in a
world that pillages, wages war, and enslaves for the earth’s rocks, the
prospect of returning to society with twenty red pack-sheep carrying “more
treasure than could be mustered by Asia, Europe, and Africa combined” is irresistible (51). The most
flinch-inducing, painful passage of this novel is not a man being driven
through with a sword or a woman’s buttocks being severed, but the idea that two
men would throw away the opportunity to live for eternity in perfection because
their society has cultivated an insatiable thirst in the core of their beings
for meaningless material wealth and power.
Voltaire further condemns materialism in the next chapter with the
description of a black amputee who has lost a hand and a leg working in the
sugar-mills. "When we work in the sugar-mills and get a finger caught in
the machinery, they cut off the hand; but if we try to run away, they cut off a
leg: I have found myself in both situations. It is the price we pay for the
sugar you eat in Europe" (51-52). The European yearning for material
wealth breeds inhumane enslavement and persecution. The slave’s anecdote moves
Candide to tears, and he criticizes Pangloss’ optimistic theology yet again,
but he is still trapped in a world of corrupt power and materialism. He doesn’t
reject societal norms and return to Eldorado, and he is afflicted when his
sheep are stolen. Unless- is he a true romantic hero, relentlessly chasing
Cunegonde to satisfy the pangs of his heart? “My friend, you see how perishable
are the riches of this world; nothing is certain but virtue, and the happiness
of seeing Mademoiselle Cunegonde again” (51). If anything redeems him in the eyes
of the reader, it is Candide’s unashamed love. You can’t hate a romantic.
I do not think that Candide is a romantic. Candide wants to marry Cunégonde the entire book because he apparantly loved her, but when he finds out she is ugly his reasons for wanting to marry her changed. It even says on page 89 right under chapter 30, the Conclusion, "At the bottom of his heart, Candide had no desire to marry Cunégonde; but the outrageous impertinence of the Baron determined him to go through with the ceremony..." So I do agree with part of what you are saying. Candide is a romantic but as you were saying earlier in your post he is unable to break free of the materialistic mind set from society that he grew to know and love. Because of Candide's actions throughout the book that are built on materialism and the desire for wealth, cause him to show that he is not the romantic we think he is. At the end, as soon as Candide finds out Cunégonde was not pretty anymore he did not want to marry her, he just wants to show up Cunégonde's brother.
ReplyDeleteIt is interesting that Candide chooses to change his views at this time in the book rather than earlier on. Also, after seeing this horrible situation caused by the greed of the world that Candide was so eager to return to he does not hesitate to continue on his way and pursue the worldly pleasures that urged him to leave Eldorado. Candide does not see that his own greed is analogous with that of the slave owner.
ReplyDelete